Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. (Voltaire 1694 – 1778)
News

Constitutional Court decree on Wikipedia published on Official Gazette; website still banned to access

by mustafa 15/01/2020
15/01/2020 956 views

The decree on the violation of freedom of expression issued by the Constitutional Court’s (AYM) General Assembly was published in the Official Gazette. However, the ban that is ongoing for the last 2.5 years is still not removed. Law expert Yaman Akdeniz stated that the AYM decree is in fact of the quality of a legal notice and that the decree was physically submitted to Ankara 1st Criminal Judicature of Peace as well. “The judicature has placed the decree in the file. We are also curious what they will do,” Akdeniz stated.

 

In the reasoned decree of AYM, the objection against the access ban was indicated to have been denied due to reasons within “the protection of national security and public order” but are ambiguous like “damaging the government’s reputation.” It was further pointed out that the ban is not only an intervention against the right to spread information and opinion, but also restricts the right to information of users in Turkey. Six member judges, voting against the decree unanimously decided, claimed that the content on the website constitutes a threat in terms of “national security” and that the Wikipedia administration is the true responsible for not removing the content.

 

15.01.2020

 

birgun.net / twitter.com/cyberrights

0
FacebookTwitterEmail
Previous Post
HRW 2020 World Report
Sonraki Post
Wikipedia free after 2 years and 8 months

You May Also Like

PFDK imposes fine and spectator ban on Batman...

15/02/2026

Construction-Work manager Deniz Gider was taken into custody.

15/02/2026

Human rights organizations react to Defne Güzel’s case

15/02/2026

The complainant in the journalists’ case was heard...

15/02/2026

OnlyFans operation: 16 arrests, two companies seized

15/02/2026

Request from the Human Rights Association for a...

15/02/2026

Detentions in Bosphorus ahead of Erdoğan’s visit

15/02/2026

Murat Kurum intervenes in the program with the...

15/02/2026

Request for punishment against journalist Mehmet Üçar

15/02/2026

Aslı Aydemir case has been postponed until June...

15/02/2026

Ramazan Yıldız, Chairman of the CHP Adalar Youth...

15/02/2026

Hacettepe University seeks up to four-year suspension for...

15/02/2026

OUR SITES

Gathering in Istanbul

Other Activities

We Discussed Conditions of Students in Prison on...

01/Jun/2018

We Discussed Ageism and Gerontocracy on Our April...

16/Apr/2018

We Discussed Hate Speech on Our March Meeting

19/Mar/2018

We Discussed Conflict Resolution on our February Meeting

26/Feb/2018

We talked about the nonviolent actions database on...

16/Jan/2018
Facebook Twitter
Youtube RSS

Düşünce Suçu!?na Karşı Girişim
www.dusun-think.net