Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. (Voltaire 1694 – 1778)
News

Constitutional Court decree on Wikipedia published on Official Gazette; website still banned to access

by mustafa 15/01/2020
15/01/2020 1025 views

The decree on the violation of freedom of expression issued by the Constitutional Court’s (AYM) General Assembly was published in the Official Gazette. However, the ban that is ongoing for the last 2.5 years is still not removed. Law expert Yaman Akdeniz stated that the AYM decree is in fact of the quality of a legal notice and that the decree was physically submitted to Ankara 1st Criminal Judicature of Peace as well. “The judicature has placed the decree in the file. We are also curious what they will do,” Akdeniz stated.

 

In the reasoned decree of AYM, the objection against the access ban was indicated to have been denied due to reasons within “the protection of national security and public order” but are ambiguous like “damaging the government’s reputation.” It was further pointed out that the ban is not only an intervention against the right to spread information and opinion, but also restricts the right to information of users in Turkey. Six member judges, voting against the decree unanimously decided, claimed that the content on the website constitutes a threat in terms of “national security” and that the Wikipedia administration is the true responsible for not removing the content.

 

15.01.2020

 

birgun.net / twitter.com/cyberrights

0
FacebookTwitterEmail
Previous Post
HRW 2020 World Report
Sonraki Post
Wikipedia free after 2 years and 8 months

You May Also Like

Protest against allegations of assault in Başkale

28/04/2026

An investigation into publisher Abdullah Keskin

28/04/2026

Constitutional Court Rejects October 10 Application

28/04/2026

Turkey blocks academic Çavuşoğlu

28/04/2026

Two academics were arrested in Tekirdağ

28/04/2026

Investigation into the Ayaş District Governor’s Office post

28/04/2026

8 arrests in DHKP/C operation

28/04/2026

Three charges against journalist Mahir Bağış

28/04/2026

The film “Rojbash” has been banned again

28/04/2026

Journalist Üçar sentenced to prison

28/04/2026

Pepper spray used against miners

28/04/2026

Journalist Neşe İdil sentenced to prison again

28/04/2026

OUR SITES

Gathering in Istanbul

Other Activities

We Discussed Conditions of Students in Prison on...

01/Jun/2018

We Discussed Ageism and Gerontocracy on Our April...

16/Apr/2018

We Discussed Hate Speech on Our March Meeting

19/Mar/2018

We Discussed Conflict Resolution on our February Meeting

26/Feb/2018

We talked about the nonviolent actions database on...

16/Jan/2018
Facebook Twitter
Youtube RSS

Düşünce Suçu!?na Karşı Girişim
www.dusun-think.net