Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. (Voltaire 1694 – 1778)
News

Constitutional Court denies application on “insulting President”

by mustafa 26/02/2020
26/02/2020 1076 views

The Constitutional Court (AYM) has denied the application of Sarp Ruç, who was sentenced to imprisonment due to “insulting the President,” with a half-page decree. The high court decided that his freedom of expression was not violated. The full decree states:

 

“When the application was evaluated within the frame of the documents presented as well as within the limits of the Constitutional Court’s authority to examine individual applications, it was decided that there was no intervention or that an intervention did not pose a violation against the basic rights and freedoms protected by the Turkish Constitution.”

 

Ruç’s lawyer Özgür Urfa stated, “The court denied pages of application letters with four lines of decree. Apparently, they have denied the application right away without an examination after seeing that it was about “insulting the President.” Urfa further indicated that the Constitutional Court normally doesn’t evaluate such applications and that similar applications are awaiting evaluation at the Court for years. The lawyer stated that the number of concluded applications on the matter is two, including the one made by his client, and that both were denied by the court.

 

26.02.2020

 

bianet.org

0
FacebookTwitterEmail
Previous Post
MHP leader calls, investigation opened against HDP Congress
Sonraki Post
Appeal court penalises journalist Arhan following acquittal of “insulting Erdoğan”

You May Also Like

Blocked access to news reports on the high...

23/04/2026

Allegations of a suspicious death at Batman Prison

23/04/2026

Two people who unfurled a flag at Hagia...

23/04/2026

A student was attacked with a club at...

23/04/2026

Prison sentence in the defamation case against Kılıçdaroğlu

23/04/2026

The trial of journalist Berivan Kutlu has been...

23/04/2026

Blocked access to news reports on the high...

23/04/2026

Call for an investigation into the death of...

23/04/2026

Backlash over censorship of the word “nepotism” on...

23/04/2026

Permission has been granted to launch an investigation...

23/04/2026

RTÜK Issues License Warning to TELE2 News

23/04/2026

Berivan Kutlu case has been postponed

23/04/2026

OUR SITES

Gathering in Istanbul

Other Activities

We Discussed Conditions of Students in Prison on...

01/Jun/2018

We Discussed Ageism and Gerontocracy on Our April...

16/Apr/2018

We Discussed Hate Speech on Our March Meeting

19/Mar/2018

We Discussed Conflict Resolution on our February Meeting

26/Feb/2018

We talked about the nonviolent actions database on...

16/Jan/2018
Facebook Twitter
Youtube RSS

Düşünce Suçu!?na Karşı Girişim
www.dusun-think.net