Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. (Voltaire 1694 – 1778)
News

Court of Cassation approves sentences against 14 lawyers in Contemporary Lawyers Association case

by mustafa 16/09/2020
16/09/2020 756 views

16th Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation decided for the approval of the sentences issued against 14 lawyers on trial within the Contemporary Lawyers Association (ÇHD) Case, except defendant lawyers Barkın Timtik, Selçuk Kozağaçlı and Ezgi Çakır. The lawyers will remain arrested. Since lawyer Ebru Timtik is deceased during her indefinite hunger strike, the court issued a lack of jurisdiction for her. On the other hand, the execution of lawyer Aytaç Ünsal, who ended his indefinite hunger strike after his release, will be deferred until his medical treatment ends.

 

The Court of Cassation decree evaluated “lawyers’ identification with their clients” as a crime. The court also replied to the objection on the evidence in the file being obtained through illegal ways by saying, “It would take a very long time to examine the evidence” and hasn’t seen anything unlawful in accordance with the legislation. The Court of Cassation admitted that the examination on recusation in the case wasn’t duly executed but hasn’t accepted this as a reason for abatement.

 

16.09.2020

 

bianet.org

0
FacebookTwitterEmail
Previous Post
Constitutional Court issues second violation decree against censorship on sendika.org
Sonraki Post
Sırrı Sakık sentenced to 5-year imprisonment!

You May Also Like

On July 7, he will appear before the...

08/05/2025

Trial of 3 journalists postponed

08/05/2025

Goethe Medal to Osman Kavala from Germany

08/05/2025

Journalist Sadık Topaloğlu’s trial postponed

08/05/2025

Witness to be heard in journalist Nurcan Yalçın’s...

08/05/2025

Journalists Ercüment Akdeniz and Yıldız Tar charged with...

08/05/2025

Journalist Ayşenur Arslan acquitted

08/05/2025

Erdogan: Anyone who picks up a microphone and...

08/05/2025

A lawsuit was filed against presenter Ece Üner:...

08/05/2025

Views of ‘justice’ from Turkey: Attackers of Halk...

08/05/2025

Press organizations in front of the Ministry of...

08/05/2025

TGS Press Freedom Report was announced: “Free journalism...

08/05/2025

OUR SITES

Gathering in Istanbul

Other Activities

We Discussed Conditions of Students in Prison on...

01/Jun/2018

We Discussed Ageism and Gerontocracy on Our April...

16/Apr/2018

We Discussed Hate Speech on Our March Meeting

19/Mar/2018

We Discussed Conflict Resolution on our February Meeting

26/Feb/2018

We talked about the nonviolent actions database on...

16/Jan/2018
Facebook Twitter
Youtube RSS

Düşünce Suçu!?na Karşı Girişim
www.dusun.sanaryurdatapan.com