Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. (Voltaire 1694 – 1778)
News

Constitutional Court rules violation of rights against police attack on Suruç commemoration in 2019

by Dusun-Think 19/05/2025
19/05/2025 254 views

The Constitutional Court (AYM) evaluated the police intervention against the commemoration protest in Ankara on the anniversary of the Suruç Massacre in 2019 as a violation of rights. In the decision, it was stated that law enforcement officers used disproportionate violence and violated the right to assembly and demonstration.

The applicants were detained and beaten during the commemoration they organized on July 20, 2019 on Sakarya Street in Ankara. The physical damage caused by the police intervention was documented in forensic reports. However, the prosecutor’s office had decided not to prosecute public officials.

In its decision dated 2 May 2024, the Constitutional Court emphasized that the intervention was contrary to the principle of necessity and proportionality and that the investigation was ineffective. It also ruled that the right to assembly was unlawfully restricted on the grounds of the state of emergency.

The court ordered the applicants to pay non-pecuniary damages and stated that the Ankara Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office should have conducted an effective investigation.

Furthermore, the Ankara Regional Administrative Court found it unlawful not to process complaints against public officials without a preliminary examination and annulled this decision.

14.05.2025

Sendika.org

0
FacebookTwitterEmail
Previous Post
Professional organizations declare support for journalist Öztürk
Sonraki Post
Journalist Evrim Kepenek sentenced to 10 months in prison

You May Also Like

Kuşadası Mayor Ömer Günel has been taken into...

14/03/2026

12 people have been arrested in connection with...

14/03/2026

Decision to extend Murat Övüç’s detention

14/03/2026

Sabahat Akkiraz testified in the investigation into the...

14/03/2026

The İzmir Bar Association has called for an...

14/03/2026

It was announced that the police officer wanted...

14/03/2026

Eğitim Sen has called for an investigation into...

14/03/2026

The Constitutional Court found no violation in the...

14/03/2026

“Cezaevinde kalamaz” raporuyla tahliye edilen Toğluk yeniden tutuklandı

14/03/2026

Two people sentenced to prison for criticizing an...

14/03/2026

IHD Report: The braided hair symbol was banned...

14/03/2026

Ahmet Altan and Nazlı Ilıcak sentenced to prison...

14/03/2026

OUR SITES

Gathering in Istanbul

Other Activities

We Discussed Conditions of Students in Prison on...

01/Jun/2018

We Discussed Ageism and Gerontocracy on Our April...

16/Apr/2018

We Discussed Hate Speech on Our March Meeting

19/Mar/2018

We Discussed Conflict Resolution on our February Meeting

26/Feb/2018

We talked about the nonviolent actions database on...

16/Jan/2018
Facebook Twitter
Youtube RSS

Düşünce Suçu!?na Karşı Girişim
www.dusun-think.net