Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. (Voltaire 1694 – 1778)
News

“There is disproportionate censorship in Turkey”

by mustafa 27/11/2019
27/11/2019 1315 views
“There is disproportionate censorship in Turkey”

Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights Dunja Mijatovic presented her opinion in Wikipedia’s application at the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) due to being censored in Turkey since April 29, 2017. Mijatovic indicated with amendments made on the Internet Law No. 5651 since 2014, Turkey has been extending the scope of censorship. The Commissioner evaluated that Internet censorship and online access in Turkey is regulated “extremely disproportionately.” Explaining the resistance of local courts against Constitutional Court decrees with various examples, Mijatovic underlined that this situation carries the meaning of a strike against judicial impartiality and Constitutional supremacy and law in Turkey. “I am sad that this development lead to questions in the effectiveness of the Constitutional Court as a domestic remedy. In the current state of affairs, the Constitutional Court can not be relied upon against violations based on Internet access bans.”

 

27.11.2019

 

gazeteduvar.com.tr

0
FacebookTwitterEmail
Previous Post
52 summaries against three HDP MPs
Sonraki Post
Penalties claimed in “Büyükada Case”

You May Also Like

Kaos GL executives detained

14/09/2026

Ekrem İmamoğlu sentenced to 2 years and 1...

14/09/2026

Investigation launched into Ertuğrul Kaya

14/09/2026

Access blocked to accounts and websites of LGBTI+...

14/09/2026

Journalist Ahmet Polad arrested

14/09/2026

Diyarbakır screening of Rojbash canceled

14/09/2026

One person arrested in Kuşadası in LGBTI+ operations

14/09/2026

Access blocked to Mika Can Raun’s accounts

14/09/2026

Access blocked to 31 LGBTI+ accounts

14/09/2026

Semih Varol detained

14/09/2026

Up to 6 years in prison sought for...

14/09/2026

Academics barred from earning digital income

14/09/2026

OUR SITES

Gathering in Istanbul

Other Activities

We Discussed Conditions of Students in Prison on...

01/Jun/2018

We Discussed Ageism and Gerontocracy on Our April...

16/Apr/2018

We Discussed Hate Speech on Our March Meeting

19/Mar/2018

We Discussed Conflict Resolution on our February Meeting

26/Feb/2018

We talked about the nonviolent actions database on...

16/Jan/2018
Facebook Twitter
Youtube RSS

Düşünce Suçu!?na Karşı Girişim
www.dusun-think.net