Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. (Voltaire 1694 – 1778)
News

“There is disproportionate censorship in Turkey”

by mustafa 27/11/2019
27/11/2019 851 views
“There is disproportionate censorship in Turkey”

Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights Dunja Mijatovic presented her opinion in Wikipedia’s application at the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) due to being censored in Turkey since April 29, 2017. Mijatovic indicated with amendments made on the Internet Law No. 5651 since 2014, Turkey has been extending the scope of censorship. The Commissioner evaluated that Internet censorship and online access in Turkey is regulated “extremely disproportionately.” Explaining the resistance of local courts against Constitutional Court decrees with various examples, Mijatovic underlined that this situation carries the meaning of a strike against judicial impartiality and Constitutional supremacy and law in Turkey. “I am sad that this development lead to questions in the effectiveness of the Constitutional Court as a domestic remedy. In the current state of affairs, the Constitutional Court can not be relied upon against violations based on Internet access bans.”

 

27.11.2019

 

gazeteduvar.com.tr

0
FacebookTwitterEmail
Previous Post
52 summaries against three HDP MPs
Sonraki Post
Penalties claimed in “Büyükada Case”

You May Also Like

Retired Assembly members marching from Istanbul to Ankara...

01/07/2025

Three employees of Leman Magazine detained in reverse...

01/07/2025

Court Requests All Records from Police: Torture and...

01/07/2025

Reporter Ali Macit’s X account blocked

01/07/2025

Violation of Right to Education in Diyarbakır Prison

01/07/2025

Journalist Altan Sancar’s X account blocked

01/07/2025

Still No Verdict in “Operation Return to Life”...

01/07/2025

BirGün Executives’ Akın Gürlek Case Postponed to September

01/07/2025

Arbitrary Arrests at 23rd Istanbul Pride March

01/07/2025

Constitutional Court ruled that Evrensel’s freedom of expression...

01/07/2025

Islamists Attack Leman Magazine Building

01/07/2025

Threat to journalist Uludağ after reporting on torture:...

01/07/2025

OUR SITES

Gathering in Istanbul

Other Activities

We Discussed Conditions of Students in Prison on...

01/Jun/2018

We Discussed Ageism and Gerontocracy on Our April...

16/Apr/2018

We Discussed Hate Speech on Our March Meeting

19/Mar/2018

We Discussed Conflict Resolution on our February Meeting

26/Feb/2018

We talked about the nonviolent actions database on...

16/Jan/2018
Facebook Twitter
Youtube RSS

Düşünce Suçu!?na Karşı Girişim
www.dusun-think.net