Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. (Voltaire 1694 – 1778)
News

Court issues acquittal for slogan ‘Bijî Serok Apo’

by Dusun-Think 01/08/2018
01/08/2018 632 views

The lawsuit filed against two children, who allegedly chanted the slogan, “Bijî Serok Apo [Long Live President Apo],” with hand gestures depicting victory at the entertainment park they visited in Diyarbakır, was concluded with acquittal of the charge of ‘illegal organization propaganda’ in the first hearing.

 

Diyarbakır Juvenile Assize Court referred to a precedent issued in 2015 by the 16th Criminal Chamber of the Court of Appeals, stating that the chanted slogan does not contain any expressions that would provoke, legitimize or praise terroristic methods containing violence, force and threat. In the precedent decree, the Criminal Chamber of the Court of Appeals had stated, “Freedom of expression must not only be applicable on information and knowledge that are reacted positively or neutrally, but also on opinions which could shock people, make them uncomfortable or create possible divisions in society as well; as a necessity of plurality and tolerance shaping a democratic society.”

 

01.08.2018

 

demokrathaber.org

0
FacebookTwitterEmail
Previous Post
Pembe Hayat editor attacked
Sonraki Post
Presidential Decrees

You May Also Like

Lawsuit filed against 19 youth detained in “Standing...

14/06/2025

Journalists’ fees for technical support, royalty payments and...

14/06/2025

Investigation into posts on Israel’s attacks on Iran

14/06/2025

Lawyer Gökhan Türkoğlu arrested for “insulting the President”...

14/06/2025

Release decision for journalist Reyhan Hacıoğlu

14/06/2025

Journalists were detained: Taken by bus from Istanbul...

14/06/2025

Ulaş Karasu Shameful concert ban on artists

14/06/2025

Journalist Rahime Karvar released at first hearing

14/06/2025

Disciplinary proceedings against 8 students at Koç University:...

14/06/2025

Police attack on protesters in Ankara against VELA,...

14/06/2025

Protest in Urfa demanding the reinstatement of those...

14/06/2025

Continuation of detention ordered for Özdağ

14/06/2025

OUR SITES

Gathering in Istanbul

Other Activities

We Discussed Conditions of Students in Prison on...

01/Jun/2018

We Discussed Ageism and Gerontocracy on Our April...

16/Apr/2018

We Discussed Hate Speech on Our March Meeting

19/Mar/2018

We Discussed Conflict Resolution on our February Meeting

26/Feb/2018

We talked about the nonviolent actions database on...

16/Jan/2018
Facebook Twitter
Youtube RSS

Düşünce Suçu!?na Karşı Girişim
www.dusun-think.net