Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. (Voltaire 1694 – 1778)
News

Constitutional Court decides access ban is violation of press freedom and freedom of expression

by Dusun-Think 26/04/2019
26/04/2019 944 views

The Constitutional Court (AYM) decided that the access ban brought on the news article published on BiaNet eight years ago, entitled, “Plagiarism: Find the Difference” was “a violation of press freedom and freedom of expression.” The news explained that former Minister of National Education, Ömer Dinçer, made plagiarism in his book and the news article was banned to access with a decree issued by Istanbul 9th Criminal Judicature of Peace on July 8, 2015.

 

Deciding for retrial to eliminate the consequences of the violation, AYM stated, “There is no doubt that the news on certain allegations that ‘plagiarism’ was detected in the works of a minister, who was assigned to lead a ministry that regulates the educational politics of the country, present a contribution for a debate that is of high public concern… Reasons presented are not relevant and unacceptable for an access ban.”

 

26.04.2019

 

bianet.org

 
0
FacebookTwitterEmail
Previous Post
Petition continues: Constitutional Court remained silent for two years, Teacher Ayşe imprisoned again
Sonraki Post
“Demirtaş Case”: Arrest continues

You May Also Like

Rights violations at Osmaniye Prison brought before Parliament

11/10/2026

Prison sentence sought for Mabel Matiz and Sinan...

11/10/2026

Social media users detained in 10 provinces

11/10/2026

Access blocked to EngelliWeb’s X account

11/10/2026

Can Atalay ended hunger strike

11/10/2026

Three detained at Kırıkkale Municipality

11/10/2026

Alican Önlü detained

11/10/2026

Three mayors detained in Mersin

11/10/2026

Reşit Kibar case adjourned to 22 January

11/10/2026

Intervention against club promotion activities at Mimar Sinan...

11/10/2026

Journalist Derya Okatan arrested

11/10/2026

Person who threw Turkish flag in trash detained

11/10/2026

OUR SITES

Gathering in Istanbul

Other Activities

We Discussed Conditions of Students in Prison on...

01/Jun/2018

We Discussed Ageism and Gerontocracy on Our April...

16/Apr/2018

We Discussed Hate Speech on Our March Meeting

19/Mar/2018

We Discussed Conflict Resolution on our February Meeting

26/Feb/2018

We talked about the nonviolent actions database on...

16/Jan/2018
Facebook Twitter
Youtube RSS

Düşünce Suçu!?na Karşı Girişim
www.dusun-think.net