Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. (Voltaire 1694 – 1778)
News

Reinstatement denied to academic who signed Peace Petition

by Dusun-Think 11/10/2026
11/10/2026 56 views

Ankara Regional Administrative Court 13th Administrative Litigation Chamber rejected by majority vote on 24 September the reinstatement application of Assoc. Prof. Hakan Koçak, who was dismissed from Kocaeli University by decree on 1 September 2016 for signing the Peace Petition. The court considered his signature on the petition “We Will Not Be a Party to This Crime” sufficient to establish contact and affiliation with the PKK and deemed his dismissal from public service a proportionate interference with freedom of expression. Dissenting judge Fazilet Akgül Arman stated that the file contained insufficient information and documents establishing an organizational connection. The Council of State 5th Chamber had previously ruled in cases involving Academics for Peace that signing the petition alone could not constitute evidence of contact or affiliation with an organization. The Council of State upheld reinstatement rulings concerning Ahmet Murat Aytaç, Halis Ulaş and Serdar M. Değirmencioğlu and also ruled in Hafize Öztürk Türkmen’s case that the signature alone did not constitute sufficient evidence. Koçak said the judicial process, which had lasted nearly 10 years, was political in nature. An appeal to the Council of State remained available against the appellate ruling.

7 October 2026

bianet

0
FacebookTwitterEmail
Previous Post
Operation against Çeşme Municipality
Sonraki Post
Social media investigation launched into Berna Laçin

You May Also Like

39 arrested in Bakırköy Municipality investigation

31/10/2026

Two more arrested in Sarıgül investigation, total rises...

31/10/2026

Merkezefendi Mayor Şeniz Doğan and her husband arrested

31/10/2026

Investigation launched into 9 Boğaziçi University students over...

31/10/2026

Police block Dokuz Eylül University students’ march: 12...

31/10/2026

Case in which she was acquitted cited as...

31/10/2026

Publisher sentenced to prison for paying royalties to...

30/10/2026

Journalist Fatih Ergin kept in detention

30/10/2026

Journalist Muhammed Emin Yıldırım detained in Istanbul

30/10/2026

Milas Mayor Fevzi Topuz suspended from office

30/10/2026

Investigation launched into Istanbul Bar Association presidential candidate...

30/10/2026

Total of 42 years in prison for 11...

30/10/2026

OUR SITES

Gathering in Istanbul

Other Activities

We Discussed Conditions of Students in Prison on...

01/Jun/2018

We Discussed Ageism and Gerontocracy on Our April...

16/Apr/2018

We Discussed Hate Speech on Our March Meeting

19/Mar/2018

We Discussed Conflict Resolution on our February Meeting

26/Feb/2018

We talked about the nonviolent actions database on...

16/Jan/2018
Facebook Twitter
Youtube RSS

Düşünce Suçu!?na Karşı Girişim
www.dusun-think.net