Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. (Voltaire 1694 – 1778)
News

Lawyer Yazgan Forced sampling against human rights

by Dusun-Think 09/10/2025
09/10/2025 354 views

Dilan Polat, Engin Polat, İrem Derici, Hadise, Demet Evgar and some other names were called to testify within the scope of the investigation carried out by the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office Smuggling, Narcotics and Economic Crimes Bureau. The celebrities were taken to the Provincial Gendarmerie Command in the morning and brought to the Forensic Medicine Institute in the afternoon.
Lawyer Deniz Yazgan said, “The decision to bring them in by force can only be issued by a judge or prosecutor. Law enforcement cannot forcibly take a person from their home on their own initiative.” Yazgan stated that taking a blood sample without the person’s consent violates the Nemo Tenetur principle, which means that “no one can be forced to create evidence to incriminate themselves”.
Yazgan reminded the ECHR’s Jalloh v. Germany decision and said, “Forced sampling is a practice that violates human dignity.”

October 8, 2025

Bianet

0
FacebookTwitterEmail
Previous Post
Police intervention against CHP Youth Branch’s march to the Ministry of Justice
Sonraki Post
Lawyer Salman case to await investigation file

You May Also Like

Kaos GL executives detained

14/09/2026

Ekrem İmamoğlu sentenced to 2 years and 1...

14/09/2026

Investigation launched into Ertuğrul Kaya

14/09/2026

Access blocked to accounts and websites of LGBTI+...

14/09/2026

Journalist Ahmet Polad arrested

14/09/2026

Diyarbakır screening of Rojbash canceled

14/09/2026

One person arrested in Kuşadası in LGBTI+ operations

14/09/2026

Access blocked to Mika Can Raun’s accounts

14/09/2026

Access blocked to 31 LGBTI+ accounts

14/09/2026

Semih Varol detained

14/09/2026

Up to 6 years in prison sought for...

14/09/2026

Academics barred from earning digital income

14/09/2026

OUR SITES

Gathering in Istanbul

Other Activities

We Discussed Conditions of Students in Prison on...

01/Jun/2018

We Discussed Ageism and Gerontocracy on Our April...

16/Apr/2018

We Discussed Hate Speech on Our March Meeting

19/Mar/2018

We Discussed Conflict Resolution on our February Meeting

26/Feb/2018

We talked about the nonviolent actions database on...

16/Jan/2018
Facebook Twitter
Youtube RSS

Düşünce Suçu!?na Karşı Girişim
www.dusun-think.net