Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. (Voltaire 1694 – 1778)
News

Investigation into sharing documents in fund case

by Dusun-Think 18/10/2026
18/10/2026 65 views

A report concerning an investigation into people who shared documents from the fund investigation cited Article 285 of the Turkish Penal Code, which regulates the offense of violating the confidentiality of an investigation. The provision prescribed imprisonment of between one and three years or a judicial fine for publicly violating the confidentiality of an investigation under certain conditions. The conditions included disclosure of investigative procedures in a manner that violated the presumption of innocence, confidentiality of communications or private life, or was capable of obstructing the establishment of the material truth. The law also excluded from criminal liability reporting on investigation and prosecution proceedings without exceeding the limits of news reporting. The portion of the report included in the source did not contain information on the identities of the people investigated or the judicial measures taken against them.

12 October 2026

bianet

0
FacebookTwitterEmail
Previous Post
Access blocks targeting journalists during 5-11 October
Sonraki Post
Appeal against postponement of sick prisoner Mehmet Sait Yıldırım’s release rejected

You May Also Like

Access blocked to Millet Şahidimdir account

10/11/2026

Serkan Öz detained

10/11/2026

Access blocked to Yeni Yaşam’s website

10/11/2026

Arı said his words were changed in the...

10/11/2026

İsmail Arı described prison conditions

10/11/2026

Umut Güner detained

10/11/2026

Former Kulp Co-Mayor Sadiye Süer arrested

10/11/2026

Prosecutor sought prison sentence for Yusuf Çelik

10/11/2026

MLSA announced weekly access blocks

10/11/2026

Access blocked to 2,137 X accounts in two...

10/11/2026

Dünya did not report it, Diriliş Postası removed...

10/11/2026

Access blocked to at least 207 X accounts...

10/11/2026

OUR SITES

Gathering in Istanbul

Other Activities

We Discussed Conditions of Students in Prison on...

01/Jun/2018

We Discussed Ageism and Gerontocracy on Our April...

16/Apr/2018

We Discussed Hate Speech on Our March Meeting

19/Mar/2018

We Discussed Conflict Resolution on our February Meeting

26/Feb/2018

We talked about the nonviolent actions database on...

16/Jan/2018
Facebook Twitter
Youtube RSS

Düşünce Suçu!?na Karşı Girişim
www.dusun-think.net