Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. (Voltaire 1694 – 1778)
News

HSK penalizes judge issuing acquittal for defendant of charge “insulting Erdoğan”

by Dusun-Think 04/03/2019
04/03/2019 1753 views

Council of Judges and Prosecutors (HSK) issued a penalty of “relocation” against judge Aydın Başar, who issued the acquittal of the defendant on trial due to “insulting the President.” According to the HSK Code, relocation is the second heaviest penalty after dismissal from profession.

 

When he was a judge in Balıkesir, Başar issued a verdict of acquittal for defendant C.B., who shared a poem that he didn’t write on Facebook. Erdoğan’s lawyers filed a complaint against Başar at HSK due to his reasoned verdict. Following the complaint, HSK started an investigation against Başar in 2016. Within the investigation, the 25-year judge was exiled first to Zonguldak, then to Erzurum. HSK finally concluded the investigation against Başar and penalized him with “relocation.”

 

One member of HSK 2nd Chamber, issuing the verdict, used his vote for the dismissal of Başar from profession. Three members voted for relocation and two members voted for a reprimand. The objection Başar made against the verdict of HSK 2nd Chamber was denied by HSK General Assembly, therefore the verdict was finalized.

 

04.03.2019

 

artigercek.com

 
0
FacebookTwitterEmail
Previous Post
Freedom of Expression Weekly Bulletin (Issue 9/19, 1 March 2019)
Sonraki Post
Appeal court issues first decree in academic prosecutions; sentences finalised

You May Also Like

RTÜK fines three channels for “family” reasons

14/01/2026

Ali Kıdık: Turkish Airlines has blacklisted me

14/01/2026

Police blocked the Aleppo march in Van

14/01/2026

Three people detained for participating in Aleppo protest...

14/01/2026

The camera at the PSAKD Antep Branch was...

13/01/2026

The press and relatives were not allowed into...

13/01/2026

Police attack on women in Muş condemned

13/01/2026

TRT censored Hakan Fidan’s remarks on Iran

12/01/2026

Protest banned in front of Iranian Consulate

12/01/2026

Raids in Batman: 4 arrests

12/01/2026

Access blocked to news reports on Ekol TV...

12/01/2026

JinNews’ new X account has also been blocked

12/01/2026

OUR SITES

Gathering in Istanbul

Other Activities

We Discussed Conditions of Students in Prison on...

01/Jun/2018

We Discussed Ageism and Gerontocracy on Our April...

16/Apr/2018

We Discussed Hate Speech on Our March Meeting

19/Mar/2018

We Discussed Conflict Resolution on our February Meeting

26/Feb/2018

We talked about the nonviolent actions database on...

16/Jan/2018
Facebook Twitter
Youtube RSS

Düşünce Suçu!?na Karşı Girişim
www.dusun-think.net