Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. (Voltaire 1694 – 1778)
News

Constitutional Court denies application on “insulting President”

by mustafa 26/02/2020
26/02/2020 1254 views

The Constitutional Court (AYM) has denied the application of Sarp Ruç, who was sentenced to imprisonment due to “insulting the President,” with a half-page decree. The high court decided that his freedom of expression was not violated. The full decree states:

 

“When the application was evaluated within the frame of the documents presented as well as within the limits of the Constitutional Court’s authority to examine individual applications, it was decided that there was no intervention or that an intervention did not pose a violation against the basic rights and freedoms protected by the Turkish Constitution.”

 

Ruç’s lawyer Özgür Urfa stated, “The court denied pages of application letters with four lines of decree. Apparently, they have denied the application right away without an examination after seeing that it was about “insulting the President.” Urfa further indicated that the Constitutional Court normally doesn’t evaluate such applications and that similar applications are awaiting evaluation at the Court for years. The lawyer stated that the number of concluded applications on the matter is two, including the one made by his client, and that both were denied by the court.

 

26.02.2020

 

bianet.org

0
FacebookTwitterEmail
Previous Post
MHP leader calls, investigation opened against HDP Congress
Sonraki Post
Appeal court penalises journalist Arhan following acquittal of “insulting Erdoğan”

You May Also Like

Çukurova Municipality operation: 44 detained

26/10/2026

22 detained in Süleymancılar investigation

26/10/2026

Censorship and access blocks during 12-18 October

26/10/2026

Up to 4.5 years in prison sought for...

26/10/2026

Gendarmerie intervene in solar plant protest in Uşak:...

26/10/2026

Mining drilling continues in Ordu despite court decision

26/10/2026

15 people, including Murat Ağırel and Ömer Sarıgül,...

26/10/2026

Zeliha Ustabaş’s release postponed for fifth time

26/10/2026

Police intervene in Eğitim Sen school visit

26/10/2026

Yeşilgöz fined for protesting execution-gallows models

26/10/2026

Fourteen detained in ISIS financing investigation

26/10/2026

Journalist Bircan Değirmenci’s case adjourned

26/10/2026

OUR SITES

Gathering in Istanbul

Other Activities

We Discussed Conditions of Students in Prison on...

01/Jun/2018

We Discussed Ageism and Gerontocracy on Our April...

16/Apr/2018

We Discussed Hate Speech on Our March Meeting

19/Mar/2018

We Discussed Conflict Resolution on our February Meeting

26/Feb/2018

We talked about the nonviolent actions database on...

16/Jan/2018
Facebook Twitter
Youtube RSS

Düşünce Suçu!?na Karşı Girişim
www.dusun-think.net