Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. (Voltaire 1694 – 1778)
News

Constitutional Court decides access ban is violation of press freedom and freedom of expression

by Dusun-Think 26/04/2019
26/04/2019 850 views

The Constitutional Court (AYM) decided that the access ban brought on the news article published on BiaNet eight years ago, entitled, “Plagiarism: Find the Difference” was “a violation of press freedom and freedom of expression.” The news explained that former Minister of National Education, Ömer Dinçer, made plagiarism in his book and the news article was banned to access with a decree issued by Istanbul 9th Criminal Judicature of Peace on July 8, 2015.

 

Deciding for retrial to eliminate the consequences of the violation, AYM stated, “There is no doubt that the news on certain allegations that ‘plagiarism’ was detected in the works of a minister, who was assigned to lead a ministry that regulates the educational politics of the country, present a contribution for a debate that is of high public concern… Reasons presented are not relevant and unacceptable for an access ban.”

 

26.04.2019

 

bianet.org

 
0
FacebookTwitterEmail
Previous Post
Petition continues: Constitutional Court remained silent for two years, Teacher Ayşe imprisoned again
Sonraki Post
“Demirtaş Case”: Arrest continues

You May Also Like

Elazığ’da NATO protestolarına 14 günlük yasak

11/07/2026

Adana’da NATO karşıtı eylemlerde 9 gözaltı

11/07/2026

10 detained in operation targeting Bolu Municipality

11/07/2026

Journalist Fatma Sibel Gürcihan detained

11/07/2026

Tamar Tanrıyar’ın YouTube kanalına erişim engeli

11/07/2026

Journalist Gülnur Saydam released

11/07/2026

Comedian Deniz Göktaş arrested

11/07/2026

İmamoğlu removed from courtroom

11/07/2026

Kurdish-language media outlets blocked

11/07/2026

Sendika.Org’un X hesabına erişim engeli

11/07/2026

Journalist Fatma Sibel Gürcihan arrested

11/07/2026

Second non-prosecution decision in October 10 Massacre file

11/07/2026

OUR SITES

Gathering in Istanbul

Other Activities

We Discussed Conditions of Students in Prison on...

01/Jun/2018

We Discussed Ageism and Gerontocracy on Our April...

16/Apr/2018

We Discussed Hate Speech on Our March Meeting

19/Mar/2018

We Discussed Conflict Resolution on our February Meeting

26/Feb/2018

We talked about the nonviolent actions database on...

16/Jan/2018
Facebook Twitter
Youtube RSS

Düşünce Suçu!?na Karşı Girişim
www.dusun-think.net