Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. (Voltaire 1694 – 1778)
News

Constitutional Court decides access ban is violation of press freedom and freedom of expression

by Dusun-Think 26/04/2019
26/04/2019 588 views

The Constitutional Court (AYM) decided that the access ban brought on the news article published on BiaNet eight years ago, entitled, “Plagiarism: Find the Difference” was “a violation of press freedom and freedom of expression.” The news explained that former Minister of National Education, Ömer Dinçer, made plagiarism in his book and the news article was banned to access with a decree issued by Istanbul 9th Criminal Judicature of Peace on July 8, 2015.

 

Deciding for retrial to eliminate the consequences of the violation, AYM stated, “There is no doubt that the news on certain allegations that ‘plagiarism’ was detected in the works of a minister, who was assigned to lead a ministry that regulates the educational politics of the country, present a contribution for a debate that is of high public concern… Reasons presented are not relevant and unacceptable for an access ban.”

 

26.04.2019

 

bianet.org

 
0
FacebookTwitterEmail
Previous Post
May 1st celebrations not permitted in Taksim, again
Sonraki Post
What happened in the 2019 Local Elections?

You May Also Like

IHD: End the isolation of Ahmet Yıldız

15/07/2025

Person insulting veteran on social media detained

15/07/2025

Detained student with broken finger given hospital appointment...

15/07/2025

34 million TL fine for farmers throwing watermelons...

15/07/2025

Access blocked to the decision to demolish buildings...

15/07/2025

People detained in Hatay Bozlu protest against quarry...

15/07/2025

Student who opened a banner reading “Trustees will...

15/07/2025

CHP’s Stand was taken to Court: District Chairman...

15/07/2025

Police violence against family listening to Kurdish song:...

15/07/2025

Dismissed workers in Izmir tried to enter the...

15/07/2025

Rabia Naz’s father Şaban Vatan goes to jail

15/07/2025

Protest in Izmir in support of “exiled” teacher

15/07/2025

OUR SITES

Gathering in Istanbul

Other Activities

We Discussed Conditions of Students in Prison on...

01/Jun/2018

We Discussed Ageism and Gerontocracy on Our April...

16/Apr/2018

We Discussed Hate Speech on Our March Meeting

19/Mar/2018

We Discussed Conflict Resolution on our February Meeting

26/Feb/2018

We talked about the nonviolent actions database on...

16/Jan/2018
Facebook Twitter
Youtube RSS

Düşünce Suçu!?na Karşı Girişim
www.dusun-think.net