Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. (Voltaire 1694 – 1778)
News

Constitutional Court reverses conviction based on secret witness testimony

by Dusun-Think 10/07/2018
10/07/2018 1140 views

Constitutional Court (AYM) decided for a violation of the ‘right to fair trial’ in the application of Serdar Batur, who was sentenced to a total of 12 years and 11 months of imprisonment due to secret witness statements that claimed that he “threw stones and molotov cocktails on the Justice and Development Party (AKP) building” as well as “participated in illegal demonstration” in Eruh district of Siirt.

 

Indicating that there is no sufficient evidence in the file except secret witness statements, the Constitutional Court stated that the prosecution period did not follow a procedure that provided balancing security between allegation and defense; and that the defense statement could not test the liability of the secret witness statement through interrogation. “The mere fact that the secret witness statements were read out loud in front of the defendant and the complainant does not lead to sufficient opportunity against the witness statement. The reason for the anonymity of the witness was not mentioned in the file, the decree was based mostly on the statements of the secret witness with the codename ‘Eruh 56’ and that no balance was seen between the witness benefits and the defendant’s rights to fair trial, when the guarantees for the defendant is considered,” the high court stated. The file was sent back to the local court to eliminate the consequences of the violation through retrial.

 

10.07.2018

 

gazeteduvar.com.tr

0
FacebookTwitterEmail
Previous Post
Journalist Şerife Oruç taken into custody immediately after release
Sonraki Post
Four METU students arrested after custody due to banner

You May Also Like

Blocked from Accessing Hornet Again

22/06/2026

Detention in ISIS Operation

22/06/2026

Yeşiltaş Responds with Disciplinary Action

22/06/2026

Dismissals in the CHP

22/06/2026

Restrictions Ahead of the NATO Summit

22/06/2026

Former Chief Prosecutor Suspended

22/06/2026

Two People Were Detained in Bismil

22/06/2026

Raid on Beylikdüzü Municipality

22/06/2026

Silivri Mayor Arrested

22/06/2026

Abdurrahman Gök Trial Postponed

22/06/2026

Investigation into the Administrator’s Statement

22/06/2026

House Arrest for a Street Interview

22/06/2026

OUR SITES

Gathering in Istanbul

Other Activities

We Discussed Conditions of Students in Prison on...

01/Jun/2018

We Discussed Ageism and Gerontocracy on Our April...

16/Apr/2018

We Discussed Hate Speech on Our March Meeting

19/Mar/2018

We Discussed Conflict Resolution on our February Meeting

26/Feb/2018

We talked about the nonviolent actions database on...

16/Jan/2018
Facebook Twitter
Youtube RSS

Düşünce Suçu!?na Karşı Girişim
www.dusun-think.net