Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
Düşünce Suçu?!na Karşı Girişim
  • Think
    • News
    • Turkey Today
      • The Mirror
      • Transparent Turkey
      • Judging the Judiciary
      • Law Articles
      • People & Cases
    • Newsletter
    • Actions
      • Time Warp
      • Submit a Proposal & Join an Action
      • Lawsuits Against Us
      • Supporters
    • Workshops
    • Gathering in Istanbul
  • About Us
    • Who are we?
    • FAQs
    • Awards
    • Links
  • Annual Publications
  • Reports
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. (Voltaire 1694 – 1778)
News

Constitutional Court denies “communication freedom” of prisoner

by Dusun-Think 07/01/2019
07/01/2019 861 views

Constitutional Court unanimously found the application of H.Ö., who is arrested in Tekirdağ and Silivri, on the freedom of communication “unacceptable”.

 

H.Ö. has been arrested on July 17 after the coup attempt on July 15, 2016 due to “illegal organization membership.” The order from Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, dated August 12, 2016, banned all suspects arrested within the “FETÖ/PDY” investigations from using written tools of communication during the State of Emergency. H.Ö. indicated that “the verdict of measure issued with an arbitrary scope and limitations and without individualisation is against the law and the verdict prevents the freedom to communicate” and made an objection to Silivri 2nd Office of Judge of Execution. The objection was denied. The reasoned denial of the Judge’s Office, dated May 30, 2017, indicated that the inspection of the ban is not within their authority; therefore the file was carried to the Constitutional Court.

 

H.Ö. was released with an interim verdict issued by Istanbul 29th Assize Court on November 10, 2017. The Prosecutor’s Office verdict on the ban on suspects from using written communication tools was reversed on February 27, 2018. Meanwhile, the Constitutional Court found the application of H.Ö. unacceptable due to the lack of exhaustion of remedies and the revocation of the related ban verdict.

 

07.01.2019

 

bianet.org

 
0
FacebookTwitterEmail
Previous Post
Academic dismissed from university due to being “inappropriate” for the job
Sonraki Post
TGS: Sözcü Daily prevents union rights

You May Also Like

Ramazan Başak was taken into custody

07/05/2026

Backlash over Sırrı Sakık’s Kurdish sermon

07/05/2026

CHP council member taken into custody

07/05/2026

Intervention in the Hakan Tosun case

07/05/2026

Asset freeze against the Böcek family

07/05/2026

The Secretary-General of the Antalya Metropolitan Municipality has...

07/05/2026

The Dargeçit JİTEM case was dismissed

07/05/2026

The Sedef Kabaş trial has been postponed

07/05/2026

Investigation into journalist Ahmet Güneş

07/05/2026

The opposition’s motions were rejected

07/05/2026

90 websites blocked

07/05/2026

Access blocked to many X accounts

07/05/2026

OUR SITES

Gathering in Istanbul

Other Activities

We Discussed Conditions of Students in Prison on...

01/Jun/2018

We Discussed Ageism and Gerontocracy on Our April...

16/Apr/2018

We Discussed Hate Speech on Our March Meeting

19/Mar/2018

We Discussed Conflict Resolution on our February Meeting

26/Feb/2018

We talked about the nonviolent actions database on...

16/Jan/2018
Facebook Twitter
Youtube RSS

Düşünce Suçu!?na Karşı Girişim
www.dusun-think.net